Adverse Events Following SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccination in Adolescents: A Norwegian Nationwide Register-Based Study (preprint)

BackgroundVaccination of older adolescents against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) started in the spring of 2021 and continued with younger adolescents throughout the summer and fall. We assessed risks of adverse events following immunization (AEFI) in adolescents aged 12-19 years following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination with a messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine in Norway. Materials and MethodsThe study sample included 496,432 adolescents born in 2002-2009, residing in Norway, and unvaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 at the beginning of the age-specific waves of vaccination in 2021. The exposures under study were first- and second-dose SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations vs. no dose. We applied Poisson regression and self-controlled case series (SCCS) analysis to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of 17 preselected outcomes, with associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs), between vaccinated and unvaccinated subjects using predefined post-vaccination risk windows. ResultsMost outcome-specific numbers of cases were low. There were no statistically significant associations between first-dose vaccination and any of the outcomes. In the main Poisson regression, second-dose vaccination was associated with increased risks of anaphylactic reaction (adjusted IRR [aIRR]: 10.05; 95% CI: 1.22-82.74), lymphadenopathy (aIRR: 2.33; 95% CI: 1.46-3.72), and myocarditis and pericarditis (aIRR: 5.27; 95% CI: 1.98-14.05). We also observed increased incidence of acute appendicitis outside the 14-day risk window. When expanding the risk window to 42 days in a post-hoc analysis, there was increased incidence of acute appendicitis following both first-dose vaccination (aIRR: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.09-1.78) and second-dose vaccination (aIRR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.07-1.91). Results of the SCCS analysis were similar to the Poisson regression. ConclusionsIn general, potential AEFI were rare among adolescents. We found increased risks of anaphylactic reaction, lymphadenopathy, and myocarditis and pericarditis following second-dose vaccination. There were also indications of increased acute appendicitis risk when applying longer risk windows.

Epidemiology and Outcome of Acute Appendicitis during and before the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis.

Background and Objectives: We investigated epidemiological factors and outcomes, including the development of complications, for patients with appendicitis according to three sequential coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic periods, divided by specific time points. Materials and Methods: This observational study included patients with acute appendicitis who arrived at a single-center between March 2019 and April 2022. The study divided the pandemic into three periods: period A as the first phase of the pandemic (from 1 March 2020 to 22 August 2021), period B as the time period the medical system stabilized (from 23 August 2021 to 31 December 2021), and period C as the time period of the exploration of patients with COVID-19 in South Korea (from 1 January 2022 to 30 April 2022). Data collection was based on medical records. The primary outcome was presence or absence of complications and the secondary outcomes were the time taken from ED visit to surgical intervention, the presence and time of the first administration of antibiotics, and the hospital stay time. Results: Of 1,101 patients, 1,039 were included, with 326 and 711 patients before and during the pandemic, respectively. Incidence of complications was not affected during the pandemic (before the pandemic 58.0%; period A 62.7%; period B,55.4%; and period C 58.1%; p = 0.358). Time from symptom onset to emergency department (ED) arrival significantly decreased during the pandemic (before the pandemic 47.8 ± 84.3 h; pandemic 35.0 ± 54 h; p = 0.003). Time from ED visit to the operating room was statistically significantly increased during the pandemic (before the pandemic 14.3 ± 21.67 h; period A 18.8 ± 14.02 h; period B 18.8 ± 8.57 h; period C 18.3 ± 12.95 h; p = 0.001). Age and time from symptom onset to ED arrival were variables affecting the incidence of complications; however, they were not affected during the pandemic (age, OR 2.382; 95% CI 1.545-3.670; time from symptom onset to ED arrival, OR 1.010, 95% CI 1.006-1.010; p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study found no differences in postoperative complications or treatment durations between pandemic periods. The incidence of appendicitis complications was significantly influenced by age and the duration between the onset of symptoms and arrival at the emergency department, but not by the pandemic period itself.

Clinical characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-related acute appendicitis.

BACKGROUND: In a large nationwide mass vaccination setting, the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine was recently linked to myocarditis, lymphadenopathy, herpes zoster infection and appendicitis. We aimed to examine the characteristics and management of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-related acute appendicitis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study in a large tertiary medical centre in Israel. All patients presenting with acute appendicitis within 21 days of receiving their SARS-CoV-2 vaccination (PCVAA group) were compared with patients who presented with acute appendicitis not related to the vaccination (N-PCVAA group). RESULTS: We reviewed the records of 421 patients with acute appendicitis from December 2020 to September 2021; 38 (9%) patients presented with acute appendicitis within 21 days of receiving their SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Patients in the PCVAA group were older than those in the N-PCVAA group (mean 41 ± 19 yr v. 33 ± 15 yr, respectively, p = 0.008), with male predominance. More patients were managed nonsurgically during the pandemic than before the pandemic (24% v. 18%, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: With the exception of older age, the clinical characteristics of patients presenting with acute appendicitis within 21 days of receiving the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination did not differ from those of patients who presented with acute appendicitis not related to the vaccination. This finding suggests that vaccine-related acute appendicitis is similar to "classic" acute appendicitis.

[Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the mucosa of the appendices of children with COVID-19]. / Vyyavlenie RNK SARS-CoV-2 v slizistoi obolochke cherveobraznogo otrostka u detei s COVID-19.

Background. The novel coronavirus infection (COVID-19) often manifests in children as diarrhea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and some children develop acute appendicitis. To elucidate the role of SARS-CoV-2 in the development of acute appendicitis, a more detailed study of the presence of its genetic material in the tissue of the appendix. OBJECTIVE: Determination of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in appendices of children with COVID-19 by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of case histories and morphological analysis using FISH of appendices of pediatric patients with established clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis and confirmed infection with SARS-CoV-2 was performed. The material was divided into 3 groups: 1st -appendices obtained during appendectomy in children with established clinical diagnosis of «coronavirus infection¼ (COVID-19, PCR+) (n=42; mean age 10.8 years); 2nd - appendices of children (n=55; mean age 9.7 years) with acute appendicitis obtained before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic; 3rd (control) group (n=38; mean age 10.3 years) - autopsy material of the appendices (intact). RESULTS: In all samples of the appendices of the 1st group, a positive SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA signal was noted in the cytoplasm of most epithelial cells and single immunocompetent cells. The signal intensity remained the same in all slides, regardless of age. In all samples obtained from patients without COVID-19 (groups 2 and 3), confocal microscopy did not reveal a signal, which indicates successful adaptation of the FISH method in this study and excludes the false positive results. CONCLUSION: In the epithelium of the appendices of children of different age with COVID-19, the FISH method revealed SARS-CoV-2 RNA, which does not exclude the association between viral invasion and the development of acute appendicitis.

Outcomes 1 year after non-operative management of uncomplicated appendicitis in children: Children with AppendicitiS during the CoronAvirus panDEmic (CASCADE) study.

BACKGROUND: A major shift in treatment of appendicitis occurred early in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic with non-operative management used commonly outside research protocols and in units with limited previous experience. This study aims to compare real-world outcomes of surgery versus non-operative management of uncomplicated appendicitis in children with 1-year follow-up. METHOD: A prospective multicentre observational study of children treated for uncomplicated appendicitis at 74 hospitals in the UK and Ireland from 1 April to 31 July 2020 was performed. Propensity-score matched analysis was conducted using age, sex, C-reactive protein at diagnosis and duration of symptoms as covariates. Primary outcomes were success of non-operative management defined as achieving 1-year follow-up without undergoing appendicectomy due to recurrent appendicitis or ongoing symptoms, and occurrence of any predefined complication (intra-abdominal collection, wound infection, bowel obstruction or reintervention). RESULTS: Of 1464 children with presumed uncomplicated appendicitis, 1027 (70.2 per cent) underwent surgery and 437 (29.9 per cent) underwent non-operative management. Ninety-four children (21.5 per cent) treated by initial non-operative management required appendicectomy during the index hospital admission while recurrent appendicitis after discharge occurred in 25 (10.4 per cent) children within 1 year. The overall success rate of non-operative management at 1 year was 63.1 per cent (95 per cent c.i. 58.0 to 68.3 per cent). For propensity-score matched analyses, 688 children undergoing surgery and 307 undergoing non-operative management were included. Any predefined complication occurred in 50 (7.3 per cent) children undergoing surgery and in four (1.3 per cent) children undergoing non-operative management (OR 5.9 (95 per cent c.i. 2.1 to 16.6)) in the propensity-score matched cohort. There was no mortality or stoma formation. CONCLUSION: Non-operative management is a safe and valid alternative to appendicectomy in children with uncomplicated appendicitis.

Higher Rates of Complicated Appendicitis During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Year-to-Year Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic impacted presentation, management strategies, and patient outcomes of numerous medical conditions. The aim of this study is to perform a year-to-year comparison of clinical outcomes of patients with acute appendicitis (AA) before and during the pandemic. METHODS: Patients treated for AA during the initial 12-mo period of the pandemic at our institute were compared to those treated for AA during the 12-mo period before. Clinical and laboratory parameters, treatment strategies, intraoperative findings, pathology reports, and postoperative outcomes were compared. RESULTS: During the study period, 541 patients presented with AA. The median (interquartile range) age was 28 (21-40) y and 292 (54%) were males. 262 (48%) patients presented during the pre-COVID-19 period, while 279 patients (52%) presented during the COVID 19 pandemic. The groups were comparable for baseline clinical data and imaging results upon index admission. There was no significant difference in rate of nonoperative treatment between the Pre-COVID-19 and During-COVID-19 eras (51% versus 53%, P = 0.6) as well as the success rate of such treatment (95.4% versus 96.4%, P = 0.3). Significantly more patients presented with a periappendicular abscess during COVID-19 (4.6% versus 1.1%, P = 0.01) and median (interquartile range) operative time was significantly longer (78 (61-90) versus 32.5 (27-45) min, P < 0.001). Pathology reports revealed a higher rate of perforated appendicitis during COVID-19 (27.4% versus 10.2%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AA present with higher rates of perforated and complicated appendicitis during the COVID-19 pandemic. The success rates of nonoperative management in selected patients with noncomplicated AA did not change during the pandemic and is a safe, feasible, option.

Two-Year Outcomes of Conservatively Managed Appendicitis During the COVID-19 Pandemic – a multicentre cohort study (preprint)

Purpose During the COVID-19 pandemic, appendicitis was more commonly managed conservatively, resulting in shorter hospital stays without increased short-term complications. The long-term outcome of this change remains unknown.Methods We conducted a multicentre, prospective, observational study including adult patients diagnosed with appendicitis after the implementation of the new surgical guidelines during the COVID-19 pandemic. Outcomes included initial management failure, re-admission rate, appendicitis recurrence and interval appendicectomy. A historical cohort prior to the COVID-19 pandemic was used for comparison. Patients were followed up for two-years post index admission.Results 63 and 79 patients with appendicitis were included from four NHS trusts, before (A) and after (B) the new intercollegiate guidelines respectively. Operative management was used less frequently in cohort B (28/79 vs 52/63; p < 0.001). More patients represented in cohort B (14/79 vs 3/63; p = 0.020), but not when comparing only those managed conservatively (2/11 vs 13/52; p = 1.000). A similar trend was observed for appendicitis recurrence although without statistical significance (2/63 vs 9/79; p = 0.112); with loss of trend when comparing those managed conservatively (2/11 vs 9/52; p = 1.000). Among all patients, four (2.8%) were found to have underlying neoplasia of which three were initially managed conservatively (3/63; 4.8%).Conclusion Conservative management of appendicitis had short-term benefits in expedited hospital discharge without early complications, but with higher readmission and appendicitis recurrence rates. The risks of this alongside missed/delayed management of neoplasia needs to be considered alongside the benefits including avoidance of aerosol-generating general anaesthesia and laparoscopy during the COVID-19 pandemic or similar future health crises.

Long term Implications in Surgical re-Assisting (L.I.S.A. study) during the Covid-19 outbreak. A retrospective observational cohort study on a rural population.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is having a worldwide impact on surgical treatment. Our aim was to investigate the impact of the pandemic in a rural hospital serving a low densely populated area. METHODS: We investigated the volume and type of surgical performed operations during both the pandemic (March 2020 - February 2021) and pre-pandemic periods (March 2019 - February 2020) as well as during the first and second pandemic waves compared to the pre-pandemic period. We compared the volume and timing of emergency appendectomy and cholecystectomy performed during the pandemic with those of the pre-pandemic period, doing the same with the volume, timing and stages of elective gastric and colorectal resections for cancer. RESULTS: In the pre-pandemic period a higher number of appendectomies (42 vs. 24) and urgent and elective cholecystectomies (174 vs. 126) was performed. The patients operated during the pandemic period (both for appendectomy and cholecystectomy) were on average older (58 vs. 52 years old, p=0.006), including for cholecystectomy (73 vs. 66 years old, p=0.01) and appendectomy (43 vs. 30 years old, p =0.04). The logistic regression analysis with regard to the cholecystectomies and appendectomies performed in emergency showed that male sex and age were associated with gangrenous type histology, both in the pandemic and pre-pandemic period. Finally, we found a reduction in the stage I and IIA colorectal cancers operated during the pandemic compared to those of the pre-pandemic period, with no increase of the advanced stages. CONCLUSIONS: The reduction in services imposed by governments during the first months of total lock down could not justify the whole decrease in surgical interventions in the year of the pandemic. Data suggest that greater "non-operative management" for appendicitis and acute cholecystitis does not lead to an increase of cases operated over time, nor to an increase in the "gangrenous" pattern, this seems to depend on age advanced and male population. KEY WORDS: COVID-19, Emergency Surgery, General Surgery, Pandemics.

Spontaneous Resolution of Uncomplicated Appendicitis may Explain Increase in Proportion of Complicated Appendicitis During Covid-19 Pandemic: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Reports of an increased proportion of complicated appendicitis during the Covid-19 pandemic suggest a worse outcome due to delay secondary to the restrained access to health care, but may be explained by a concomitant decrease in uncomplicated appendicitis. We analyze the impact of the pandemic on the incidences of complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis. METHOD: We did a systematic literature search in the PubMed, Embase and Web Of Science databases on December 21, 2022 with the search terms (appendicitis OR appendectomy) AND ("COVID" OR SARS-Cov2 OR "coronavirus"). Studies reporting the number of complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis during identical calendar periods in 2020 and the pre-pandemic year(s) were included. Reports with indications suggesting a change in how the patients were diagnosed and managed between the two periods were excluded. No protocol was prepared in advance. We did random effects meta-analysis of the change in proportion of complicated appendicitis, expressed as the risk ratio (RR), and of the change in number of patients with complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis during the pandemic compared with pre-pandemic periods, expressed as the incidence ratio (IR). We did separate analyses for studies based on single- and multi-center and regional data, age-categories and prehospital delay. RESULTS: The meta-analysis of 100,059 patients in 63 reports from 25 countries shows an increase in the proportion of complicated appendicitis during the pandemic period (RR 1.39, 95% confidence interval (95% CI 1.25, 1.53). This was mainly explained by a decreased incidence of uncomplicated appendicitis (incidence ratio (IR) 0.66, 95% CI 0.59, 0.73). No increase in complicated appendicitis was seen in multi-center and regional reports combined (IR 0.98, 95% CI 0.90, 1.07). CONCLUSION: The increased proportion of complicated appendicitis during Covid-19 is explained by a decrease in the incidence of uncomplicated appendicitis, whereas the incidence of complicated appendicitis remained stable. This result is more evident in the multi-center and regional based reports. This suggests an increase in spontaneously resolving appendicitis due to the restrained access to health care. This has important principal implications for the management of patients with suspected appendicitis.

Diagnosing the acute abdomen during a global contrast shortage: a single centre experience.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic led to a global shortage of iodinated contrast media (ICM) in early 2022. ICM is used in more than half of the computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis (CTAP) performed to diagnose an acute abdomen (AA). In response to the shortage, the RANZCR published contrast-conserving recommendations. This study aimed to compare AA diagnostic outcomes of non-contrast CTs performed before and during the shortage. METHODS: A single-centre retrospective observational cohort study of all adult patients presenting with an AA who underwent a CTAP was conducted during the contrast shortage period from May to July 2022. The pre-shortage control comparison group was from January to March 2022; key demographics, imaging modality indication and diagnostic outcomes were collected and analysed using SPSS v27. RESULTS: Nine hundred and sixty-two cases met the inclusion criteria, of which n = 502, 52.2% were in the shortage period group. There was a significant increase of 464% in the number of non-contrast CTAPs performed during the shortage period (P < 0.001). For the six AA pathologies, only n = 3, 1.8% of non-contrast CTAPs had equivocal findings requiring further imaging with a contrast CTAP. Of the total CTs performed, n = 464, 48.2% were negative. CONCLUSION: This study showed that when non-contrast CTs are selected appropriately, they appear to be non-inferior to contrast-enhanced CTAPs in diagnosing acute appendicitis, colitis, diverticulitis, hernia, collection, and obstruction. This study highlights the need for further research into utilizing non-contrast scans for assessing the AA to minimize contrast-associated complications.

[A Case of Epiploic Appendagitis after COVID-19].

Acute epiploic appendagitis is an uncommon cause of abdominal pain resulting from appendageal ischemia caused by torsion or thrombosis of the draining vein. It is frequently misdiagnosed as acute appendicitis or diverticulitis. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has changed how this rare disease is diagnosed. There was a report of a young men diagnosed with COVID-19 and epiploic appendagitis as a rare cause of abdominal pain. In addition, a 50-year-old men was diagnosed with epiploic appendagitis during the treatment of COVID-19. This paper reports the case of a 53-year-old men who presented with right lower quadrant abdominal pain after COVID-19 and was diagnosed with acute epiploic appendagitis by computed tomography image findings. The thrombotic condition of COVID-19 may contribute to acute appendagitis, but more studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.

Operative Management of Acute Appendicitis Was Safe During the COVID-19 Pandemic Shutdown.

INTRODUCTION: In the spring of 2020, New York City was one of the first epicenters of the COVID outbreak. In this study, we evaluate the incidence and treatment of appendicitis in two New York City community hospitals during the COVID pandemic. METHODS: This retrospective study focused on the incidence and outcome of acute appendicitis in the adult population (>18 y old) during peak-COVID periods (March 16, 2020,-June 15, 2020) compared to pre-COVID and post-COVID periods. We compared the number of patients who underwent operative versus nonoperative management, patient demographics, length of stay (LOS), complications, and readmission rates within these time periods. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (analysis of variance). RESULTS: From January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020, 393 patients presented with acute appendicitis and 321 (81.7%) were treated operatively, compared to 441 total and 366 treated operatively (83%) in 2019 (P = 0.88). During the COVID outbreak, fewer patients presented with appendicitis (mean 6.9 ± 1 pre-COVID case/week, 4.4 ± 2.4 peak-COVID cases/week and 7.6 ± 0.65 post-COVID cases/week, P = 0.018) with no significant difference in the pre-COVID and post-COVID period. There was no difference in LOS between the pre-, peak-, and post-COVID periods with a median of 1 for all the three, (interquartile range (IQR): 0.8-2, 0.6-2, 0.6-2, respectively, P = 0.43). Additionally, there was no difference in 30-day readmission rates (4.2%, 0%, 3.9%, P = 0.99) and postoperative complications (4.2%, 0%, 2.9%, P = 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: During peak-COVID, there was a significant reduction in the number of patients who presented with acute appendicitis without a post rebound increase in presentation. Those who presented during peak-COVID were able to undergo operative management safely, without affecting LOS or postoperative complications.

Study of perioperative outcomes of acute appendicitis during the COVID-19 pandemic: An analytical observational cohort study / Estudio de los desenlaces perioperatorios de la apendicitis aguda durante la pandemia por COVID-19: un estudio observacional analítico de cohorte

Introducción. La condición de pandemia por COVID-19 impactó a la sociedad y los sistemas de salud a nivel mundial. Las adaptaciones institucionales procuraron mantener la calidad de la atención a pesar de un contexto organizacional desfavorable. La apendicitis aguda requirió ser manejada en un nuevo escenario institucional. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la efectividad del tratamiento quirúrgico de la apendicitis durante la pandemia. Métodos. Estudio observacional analítico, retrospectivo, en el que se incluyeron pacientes sometidos a apendicectomía, antes y durante la pandemia por COVID-19. Se evaluaron las complicaciones, infección del sitio operatorio, reingresos y estancia hospitalaria. Adicionalmente, se analizaron los desenlaces en los 3 picos epidemiológicos de la pandemia. Se efectuaron estadísticas descriptivas y analíticas entre los grupos a comparar. Resultados. Se incluyeron 1521 pacientes con apendicitis, 48,3 % operados antes y 51,7 % durante la pandemia. No hubo diferencias entre los grupos en complicaciones (p=0,352), infección del sitio operatorio (p=0,191), reingreso en los primeros 30 días (p=0,605) y estancia hospitalaria (p=0,514). El manejo de la apendicitis durante el tercer pico fue similar a las prácticas habituales. El tiempo de evolución fue mayor durante la pandemia (p=0,04) y los pacientes fueron llevados a cirugía más pronto que previo a la pandemia (p<0,001). Conclusiones. No se evidenció un incremento de complicaciones quirúrgicas, reingresos, estancia hospitalaria ni infección del sitio operatorio en los pacientes operados durante la pandemia. Hubo un efecto favorable para los pacientes como consecuencia de la adaptación institucional en la pandemia por COVID-19

Introduction. COVID-19 pandemic impacted society and health systems worldwide. The institutional adaptations sought to maintain the quality of care in an unfavorable organizational context. Acute appendicitis was required to be managed in a new institutional setting. The effectiveness of surgical treatment of appendicitis during the pandemic was evaluated. Methods. Retrospective analytical observational study, in patients with appendectomy, before and during COVID-19 pandemic. Complications, surgical site infections, readmissions, and hospital stay were evaluated. Additionally, the outcomes in the 3 epidemiological peaks of the pandemic were analyzed. Descriptive and analytical statistics were performed between the groups to be compared. Results. A total of 1521 patients with appendicitis were included, 48.3% before and 51.7% during the pandemic. There were no differences in complications (p=0.352), operative site infection (p=0.191), readmission at 30 days (p=0.605), and hospital stay (p=0.514) between the groups. Management of appendicitis during the 3rd peak was like usual practices. There was a long evolution time during the pandemic (p=0.04) and the patients were taken to surgery sooner than before the pandemic (p<0.001). Conclusions. There was no evidence of an increase in surgical complications, readmissions, hospital stay, and surgical site infections during patients who underwent surgery. There was a favorable effect for patients because of institutional adaptation in the COVID-19 pandemic

Covid-19 Pandemic Strategy for Treatment of Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis with Antibiotics- Risk Categorization and Shared Decision-Making.

BACKGROUND: During the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, a protocol was adopted by our department on antibiotics treatment for Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis (AUA). Our study aimed to determine the feasibility and safety of non-operative treatment (NOT), compared to upfront laparoscopic appendectomy (LA), for AUA in children during the pandemic. METHOD: Our prospective comparative study was conducted from May 1, 2020 to January 31, 2021. Patient selection criteria included: age ≥5 years, abdominal pain duration ≤48 h, ultrasound (US)/Computered Tomography scan confirmation of AUA, US appendiceal diameter 6-11 mm with no features of perforation/abscess collection and no faecolith. For NOT patients, intravenous antibiotics were administered for 24-48 h followed by oral for 10-day course. Comparison was performed between patients whose parents preferred NOT to those who opted for up-front appendectomy. Primary outcomes were NOT success at index admission, early and late NOT failure rates till 27 months. Secondary outcomes were differences in complication rate, hospital length of stay (LOS) and cost between groups. RESULTS: 77 patients were recruited: 43 (55.8%) underwent NOT while 34 (44.2%) patients opted for LA. Success of NOT at index admission was 90.7% (39/43). Overall, NOT failure rate at 27 months' follow-up was 37.2% (16/43). Of the NOT failures, 1 appendix was normal on histology while only 1 was perforated. There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes between both groups except for LOS of late NOT failure. Cost for upfront LA was nearly thrice that of NOT. CONCLUSION: Our stringent COVID protocol together with shared decision-making with parents is a safe and feasible treatment option during a crisis situation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Treatment study, Level II.

Investigation of Serum Interleukin 6, High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein and White Blood Cell Levels during the Diagnosis and Treatment of Paediatric Appendicitis Patients Before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Introduction: In this study, we prospectively investigated changes in serum interleukin-6 (IL-6), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and full white blood cell (WBC) counts during the diagnosis and treatment of paediatric patients with appendicitis. We also investigated the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the diagnosis and treatment processes of paediatric appendicitis patients. Materials and Methods: A non-perforated appendicitis group (n = 110), a perforated appendicitis group (n = 35) and an appendicitis + COVID-19 group (n = 8) were formed. Blood samples were taken upon admission and every day until the three studied parameters returned to normal values. To investigate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on paediatric appendicitis patients, the perforated appendicitis rates and the times from the onset of the first symptoms to the operation before and during the pandemic were compared. Results: WBC, IL-6, and hsCRP dropped below the upper limits on the second postoperative day in the non-perforated appendicitis group, four to six days postoperatively in the perforated appendicitis group, and three to six days postoperatively in the appendicitis + COVID-19 group. These parameters were not within normal range in patients who developed complications during follow-up. The time from the onset of abdominal pain to the surgery was significantly longer during than before the pandemic in both the non-perforated appendicitis group and the perforated appendicitis group. Conclusions: Our results show that WBC, IL-6, and hsCRP are useful laboratory parameters that can complete clinical examinations in the diagnosis of appendicitis in paediatric patients and the identification of complications that may develop postoperatively.

Has the Covid-19 Pandemic increased the complication rate in patients with acute appendicitis?

AIM: The aim of this study is to compare the numbers of patients, clinical outcomes, and complication rates of acute appendicitis before and after COVID-19 pandemic in our clinic. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This is a retrospective clinical study. Patients of 19 to 88 years of age that underwent emergency surgery with the diagnosis of acute appendicitis at Ankara City Hospital Department of General Surgery between 11 December 2019 and 11 June 2020 were included. The first case of COVID-19 in Turkey was announced on 11 March 2020. We studied the demographics, surgical procedures, and complication rates in 3 months periods before and after the first case was announced. RESULTS: A total number of 462 patients were analyzed between the ages of 19-88, 184 of which (39.8%) were females and 278 were males (60.2%). 253 of these patients were diagnosed with AA and underwent surgery before March 11 whereas 209 patients were diagnosed and treated after March 11. DISCUSSION: There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of complication rates before and after the pandemic. Although the rate of open appendectomy was increased after the pandemic, no statistical difference has been found. CONCLUSION: No change was observed in terms of hospital admissions, methods of treatment, complication rates, length of stay before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. KEY WORDS: Acute Appendicitis, Appendectomy, COVID-19.

Has the Covid-19 Pandemic increased the complication rate in patients with acute appendicitis?

AIM: The aim of this study is to compare the numbers of patients, clinical outcomes, and complication rates of acute appendicitis before and after COVID-19 pandemic in our clinic. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This is a retrospective clinical study. Patients of 19 to 88 years of age that underwent emergency surgery with the diagnosis of acute appendicitis at Ankara City Hospital Department of General Surgery between 11 December 2019 and 11 June 2020 were included. The first case of COVID-19 in Turkey was announced on 11 March 2020. We studied the demographics, surgical procedures, and complication rates in 3 months periods before and after the first case was announced. RESULTS: A total number of 462 patients were analyzed between the ages of 19-88, 184 of which (39.8%) were females and 278 were males (60.2%). 253 of these patients were diagnosed with AA and underwent surgery before March 11 whereas 209 patients were diagnosed and treated after March 11. DISCUSSION: There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of complication rates before and after the pandemic. Although the rate of open appendectomy was increased after the pandemic, no statistical difference has been found. CONCLUSION: No change was observed in terms of hospital admissions, methods of treatment, complication rates, length of stay before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. KEY WORDS: Acute Appendicitis, Appendectomy, COVID-19.